MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1443056227 · doi:10.1137/140951618

Local Exact Controllability of a One-Dimensional Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation

2015· article· en· W1443056227 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Control and Optimization · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems
Canadian institutionsStatistics Canada
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsControllabilityMathematicsCountable setNonlinear systemLinearizationSchrödinger equationBose–Einstein condensateMathematical analysisPerturbation (astronomy)Nonlinear Schrödinger equationApplied mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsQuantum mechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a one-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation, modeling a Bose--Einstein condensate in an infinite square-well potential (box). This is a nonlinear control system in which the state is the wave function of the Bose--Einstein condensate and the control is the length of the box. We prove that local exact controllability around the ground state (associated with a fixed length of the box) holds generically with respect to the chemical potential $\mu $, i.e., up to an at most countable set of $\mu $-values. The proof relies on the linearization principle and the inverse mapping theorem, as well as ideas from analytic perturbation theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it