MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W144407670

Corticosteroid-related psychiatric complications in the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma in an adolescent.

2007· article· en· W144407670 on OpenAlexaff
Irfan Mian, Robin E. Gearing, Claire De Souza, Leigh Solomon

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManiaPsychosisPsychiatryBipolar disorderMedicinePediatricsPopulationMoodSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the case of an adolescent with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, who developed symptoms of psychosis and mania during his treatment. Psychiatric side-effects of corticosteroids in the adult population have long been recognized and documented. A wide range of mental status changes have been reported (Francois Sirois, 2003). However, case reports documenting psychosis or mania related to corticosteroid use in children are rare. Psychotic symptoms developing during the treatment of asthma have been described, sometimes with mood disorder symptoms (French et al, 2003, Couturier et al, 2001, and Dawson and Carter, 1998). Beshay and Pumariega (1998) presented the case of a boy treated for ulcerative colitis, who developed depressive and psychotic symptoms. There are also published cases of adolescents with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia developing psychotic symptoms during treatment with corticosteroids (Ducore et al, 1983, Kramer and Cottingham, 1999, Sutor et al, 1996). Our case adds to the literature involving steroid-induced psychosis and mania in an adolescent with cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life→French-language works237,207→