MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W144613612

Finite element bounds for linear functionals of exact solutions to the three-dimensional Poisson's equation

2007· article· en· W144613612 on OpenAlexaff
Shahin Ghomeshi, Zhong Cheng, Marius Paraschivoiu

Bibliographic record

Venueinternational conference on Modelling and simulation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFETIPoisson's equationFinite element methodMathematicsApplied mathematicsPoisson distributionContext (archaeology)Exact solutions in general relativityMathematical analysisDomain decomposition methodsPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method for obtaining rigorous upper and lower bounds to an output of the exact solution of the three dimensional Poisson problem is described. More recently bounds to the exact outputs of interest have been obtained for both the Poisson equation and the advection-diffusion-reaction equation. In this work, the objective is to reduce the cost of these calculations in the context of three dimensional problems. The new ingredients are two-fold. First, the finite element tearing and interconnecting (FETI) procedure is invoked in order to calculate the inter-subdomain continuity multipliers (hybrid fluxes) and extend the approach to three space dimensions where bounds to the exact output of interest in a cube geometry are reported. Second, the computational cost is reduced by using the FETI procedure because the primal and adjoint field solutions can be calculated jointly with the hybrid fluxes required for the subdomain problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.183
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueinternational conference on Modelling and simulationSame topicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsFrench-language works237,207