MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W144756261 · doi:10.1021/nl802600z

Sensitive Solution-Processed Bi<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> Nanocrystalline Photodetectors

2008· article· en· W144756261 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNano Letters · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotodetectorMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsPhotoconductivityNanocrystalline materialNanocrystalPhotovoltaicsNanorodNanotechnologyPhotovoltaic system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solution-processed nanocrystal optoelectronic devices offer large-area coverage, low cost, and compatibility with a wide range of substrates. Recently, photodetectors and photovoltaics based on spin-coated nanoparticle films have shown tremendous progress in performance. However, high-performance devices reported to date have employed either Pb or Cd, raising concerns regarding environmental impact and regulatory acceptance. Herein we report a high-performance solution-processed photodetector based instead on Bi2S3 nanocrystals. The devices exhibit photoconductive gain on the order of 10 combined with temporal response on the 10 ms time scale. The resultant solution-processed Bi2S3 nanorod photoconductive photodetectors are of interest in visible and near-infrared (NIR) wavelength applications requiring video-frame-rate temporal response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it