Leriano's Suffering Subjectivity; or, the Politics of Sentimentality in "Cárcel de amor"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se estudia en este art?culo la representaci?n del amor como sufrimiento en C?r cel de amor, con referencia al Serm?n' de Diego de San Pedro. Tal concepto de amor viene construido en la cultura occidental desde la antig?edad cl?sica en los escritos literarios, filos?ficos, m?dicos y teol?gicos. Para analizar esta noci?n de amor propongo el concepto de la subjetividad, que incluye dos manifestaciones hist?ricas: (i) la erotomania, la premoderna noci?n patol?gica de amor, o su forma est?tica, el amor cort?s; y (2) la invenci?n decimon?nica de la perversi?n del masoquismo. Al identificar los paralelos entre erotomania y/o amor cort?s con el masoquismo se analiza la performance de sufrimiento de Le riano, el protagonista de C?rcel de amor. El masoquista Leriano dramatiza su pasi?n de acuerdo con uno de los modelos dominantes de masculinidad medie val. Este modelo de la sufriente subjetividad masculina, difundido en el medioe vo principalmente en la l?rica amorosa, celebra los comportamientos que en la sociedad medieval tienen connotaci?n de nobleza, pero que desmienten la defi nici?n clara de los g?neros. Se demuestra c?mo el masoquista, adoptando la pose de v?ctima, ocupa el territorio de la subjetividad masculina y femenina, y as? ejerce control de una manera velada sobre el sujeto femenino.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".