MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1448997504 · doi:10.36744/kf.2690

Ciało w filmowym neomodernizmie

2013· article· pl· W1448997504 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rafał Syska

Bibliographic record

VenueKwartalnik Filmowy · 2013
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPolish-Jewish Holocaust Memory Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tematem szkicu jest analiza metod przedstawiania ciała aktora i bohatera we współczesnym kinie autorskim. Na egzemplifikację opisu zostały wybrane trzy strategie artystyczne zaproponowane przez Bruno Dumonta, Alberta Serrę i Aleksandra Sokurowa – reżyserów wpisujących się w tendencję filmowego neomodernizmu. Obecność ciała aktora i bohatera stanowi u każdego z nich cel interesujących działań, choć wynika z różnych postaw światopoglądowych i koncepcji estetycznych. Łączy je opór wobec klasycznych technik aktorstwa psychologicznego, rezygnacja z konwencjonalnej emotywności, indywidualizacja i personalizacja bohatera oraz intensywna obserwacja idiosynkrazji aktora i filmowej postaci. Do tego należy dodać kluczowy dla nich wątek intymności doświadczeń i eksploracji sfery fizjologicznej, a także motyw fizycznej ofiary i temat sakralizacji ciała.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.397
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0750.054

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKwartalnik FilmowySame topicPolish-Jewish Holocaust Memory StudiesFrench-language works237,207