MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1449672712 · doi:10.1093/pch/17.10.541

A holiday wish list for Canada’s Early Years System

2012· article· en· W1449672712 on OpenAlexaffabout
Robin Williams, Vivek Goel

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological interventionEarly childhoodChild developmentEconomic growthMedicinePublic relationsPsychologyPolitical scienceBusinessDevelopmental psychologyNursingEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The evidence is clear that early childhood interventions and supports have long-term health and social benefits - coordinated action is required to ensure that every Canadian child benefits. While many advances have been made to improve the chances for Canadian children to have a healthy opportunity for early childhood development, there is much to be done to ensure that they have the best opportunities possible. To ensure every child is able to reach their full potential, the following wishes are identified for Canadian children: a fairer share of the GDP for Canadian children; the development of a strong early years system; designation of a national lead on behalf of children and youth; a focus on prevention; and development of systems to monitor success and failure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0240.005
Scholarly communication0.0150.005
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0140.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicChild and Adolescent Health→French-language works237,207→