MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1451128433 · doi:10.2528/pierl15051205

ANALYTICAL SOLUTION FOR CAPACITANCE AND CHARACTERISTIC IMPEDANCE OF CPW WITH DEFECTED STRUCTURES IN SIGNAL LINE

2015· article· en· W1451128433 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress In Electromagnetics Research Letters · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCapacitanceElectrical impedanceSIGNAL (programming language)Line (geometry)Materials scienceOptoelectronicsCharacteristic impedanceChemistryElectrical engineeringElectrodeComputer scienceMathematicsEngineeringGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an analytical solution for capacitance and characteristic impedance of CPW with defected structures (CPW DS) in signal line. The first category of incomplete elliptic integrals F (φ, k) is employed for calculation, and the capacitance and characteristic impedance of CPW GS in signal line are first time achieved by the analytical solution. FEM simulation results are used to verify the results of analytical solution, which shows a good agreement. All calculations are completed in software Wolfram Mathematica, and CPW structures are simulated in software HFSS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it