MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1454180003

甘薯(Ip omoe a b atatas L.)SNP标记快速高效检测方法

2015· article· zh· W1454180003 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
许家磊, Qiang Li, 后猛, 刘亚菊, 王欣, 唐维, 闫会, 张允刚, 马代夫

Bibliographic record

Venue分子植物育种 · 2015
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

单核苷酸多态性(single nucleotide polymorphism, SNP)广泛存在于甘薯基因组中,可用于甘薯遗传图谱的构建、关联分析和分子标记辅助选择等重要研究。本研究采用两种特异性扩增的方法:等位基因特异性PCR (AS-PCR)和四引物扩增受阻突变体系PCR (Tetra-primer ARMS-PCR),以及酶切扩增多态性序列(CAPS)酶切的方法,对甘薯徐781和徐薯18之间的2个SNP位点T2-32906(C/G)和T3-30695(G/A)进行检测,并通过比较3种检测方法的检测效果,找出快速高效的甘薯SNP分子标记检测方法。琼脂糖凝胶电泳结果显示:AS-PCR 的检测结果在2个样本之间出现假阳性而没有明显的差异条带,Tetra-primer ARMS-PCR和CAPS两种方法的检测结果在2个样本间呈现出明显的差异条带,并且能够根据条带数目区分等位基因是否纯合。三种方法的检测结果表明:相对于其他两种检测方法,Tetra-primer ARMS-PCR呈现出更理想的检测效果。另外通过成本比较,Tetra-primer ARMS-PCR成本明显低于CAPS。因此,Tetra-primer ARMS-PCR是一种可用于甘薯SNP位点快速、高效且费用低廉的分子检测方法。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue分子植物育种Same topicMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207