MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W145548737 · doi:10.1093/joneph/20.2.150

Biology of arteriovenous fistula failure

2007· article· en· W145548737 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nephrology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineArteriovenous fistulaIntensive care medicineFistulaDialysisPathogenesisHemodialysisClinical trialPsychological interventionPathologySurgeryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although arteriovenous (AV) fistulae are the preferred form of dialysis access, they continue to have significant problems with both early and late failures. Despite the magnitude of the clinical problem, however, there are unfortunately no effective therapies for AV fistula failure. We believe that this inability to intervene is partly due to a lack of understanding about the pathology and pathogenesis of AV fistula failure. Therefore, in the current review we will initially explore novel concepts about the pathology and pathogenesis of AV fistula failure. This information will then be used to suggest potential therapeutic interventions for this important, yet unmet clinical need. Finally, we will end with a brief description of some state-of-the-art clinical trials that are attempting to apply some of these novel therapeutic concepts to the recalcitrant clinical problem of AV fistula failure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it