Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The interest is focused on today's interns who will soon become an essential part of the health care system. Obstacles they perceive at the beginning of the career may encourage them or, inversely, impede their professional development, enhance professional burnout or even lead to change of the profession. International literature, comprising publications on the situation in ten European countries, Canada and the USA, is reviewed. Numerous considerations have encouraged some attempts to measure "anxiety about professional future" (AAF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven factors that induce anxiety about professional future among students and young doctors are listed and briefly discussed: 1) Difficulties in getting a job and growing anxiety for maintaining the job; 2) Low wages; 3) Negative impact of work on private and family life, in particular, a conflict between the professional role and mother's role; 4) Excessive level of organizational stress; 5) Lack of (individual) resources to cope with stress; 6) Institutional and financial limitations for professional development; and 7) Worldwide evolution of the professional role and the status of doctor. A questionnaire was developed by the author and answers were collected from a representative sample of Polish interns (about 1000) and a small sample of French interns. A scale for measuring the anxiety was built with use of factor analysis. RESULTS: The resulting scale called AAF has proved to have good statistical properties. The mean value of the anxiety indicator proved to be high in Poland. Interns who are familiar with the doctor's daily duties, who feel economically independent and who have good self-valuation of the practical skills are characterized by a lower level of anxiety. AAF values in a sample of French interns was dramatically lower than those characteristic of Polish interns. CONCLUSIONS: The values of AAF for the interns can be related to the intensity of stress-inducing factors in the professional environment. Very high AAF values can stem from an excessive professional stress that may have a negative impact on individual careers and the whole health care system in Poland. Appropriate changes in the curriculum of medical studies (accompanied by legal regulations) might reduce excessive anxiety about future in graduating doctors in Poland. Such changes could include: (a) a greater involvement of students in the examination and treatment of patients and in "daily life" in health care institutions; (b) making more practice (or performing medical procedures) obligatory; (c) creating better opportunities to earn living in the medical professions (by performing procedures or by assisting professionals); and (d) making efforts in the field of practical education more rewarding (e.g., introducing rating for practice and incorporating it into fellowship schemes).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".