MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1457375648 · doi:10.33137/q.i..v34i1.19919

Frammenti di memoria

2013· article· it· W1457375648 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Antonio Catalfamo, Paolo Chirumbolo

Bibliographic record

VenueQuaderni d italianistica · 2013
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

mantenersi vitale può permettersi solo di giocare su due fronti, il primo, che si identifica con l'operazione di Spatola, "orizzontale, alla conquista di spazialità aperte e materialistiche, essenzialmente formali anche in senso puramente visivo-scritturale", il secondo "verticale, alla ricezione delle sonorità sommesse e sommosse dell'inconscio" del poetare di Porta (12).Due percorsi accomunati, sempre secondo Ferri, da una "cosciente ricerca e la profonda esaltazione della libertà della parola".( 13) In complesso i saggi si caratterizzano per una certa brevità che comunque non penalizza il respiro della ricerca degli autori rappresentati.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1410.069

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuaderni d italianisticaSame topicEducational and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207