"Space" Invasion: Jewish Canadian Women Writers and the Reshaping of Canadian Literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Casi al tiempo que se construía alrededor de “la tierra” como motivo principal, el canon canadiense empezaba a ser desmantelado por posiciones derivadas de los nuevos acercamientos al concepto de “espacio”. El (ab)uso del motivo de la tierra en la escritura canadiense se asoció rápidamente a sistemas de control patriarcales e imperialistas disfrazados de “universalidad”. Las escritoras canadienses de origen judío nos proporcionan un ejemplo excelente de la capacidad de propuestas literarias que se pueden establecer a través\n\t\t\t\t de la metáfora espacial, así como de la actual atmósfera cambiante en la que se pueden negociar complicadas cuestiones identitarias. Al ambientar sus trabajos de ficción en “cronotopos judíos”, escritoras como Anne Michaels con Fugitive Pieces y Nancy Richler con Your Mouth Is Lovely demuestran que un Canadá multicultural será posible sólo cuando todos los espacios —incluso aquellos fuera de Canadá— que pertenecen a todos sus ciudadanos estén representados en la literatura canadiense
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.057 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".