Remembrance as Resistance: Social Memory and Social Movement on Indigenous Formosa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sixty years after the conclusion of World War II, memories of the Japanese occupation of Taiwan remain a part of social and political life in the country. In the weeks leading up to the 2005 county and township elections, for example, the KMT headquarters in Taipei were adorned with an enormous image of Mona Ludaw, the aboriginal hero who had led a rebellion against the Japanese in 1930. The use of this particular image has historical precedents in KMT historical narrative of that rebellion illustrating resistance against Taiwan’s colonial overlords on behalf of the Republic of China. The electoral image, meant to appeal to the party’s hard-core Mainlander supporters, uses social memory of anti-Japanese rebellion to reinforce its image as the carrier of Chinese nationalism. In this discourse, the DPP and its supporters end up looking sympathetic to Japan and nostalgic for colonial rule. But what of the memories of Taiwan’s aboriginal people, the families and communities of Mona Ludaw? How are images and perspectives of the Japanese period evoked in personal and social memories in their communities? This paper, based on anthropological field research and interviews with villagers of the Truku people (Mona Ludaw’s tribe), shows how aboriginal memories of the period both differ from and articulate with the social memories of Mainlanders and Native Taiwanese. Although the Truku remain close to Mainlanders and tend to support the KMT, they have very distinctive ways of understanding the former Japanese presence in their lives and the violent struggles they once engaged in against that regime. The enactment of those memories, moreover, may contribute to social movements that transcend blue and green political divisions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".