MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W145807491 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2014.0009

George Eliot in Context ed. by Margaret Harris (review)

2014· article· en· W145807491 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Constance M. Fulmer

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian periodicals review · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicModernist Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeorge (robot)Context (archaeology)CriticismHistoryAfterlifeArt historyClassicsSociologyPhilosophyLiteratureArtArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: George Eliot in Context ed. by Margaret Harris Constance M. Fulmer (bio) Margaret Harris, ed., George Eliot in Context (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. xxxii + 334, $110/£65 cloth. Margaret Harris’s edited collection is designed to make George Eliot “less abstract by attending to some of the ‘wider relations’ that establish coordinates on her life and work” (xvii). In her preface, Harris illustrates Eliot’s elusiveness by examining the ways in which she “was conscious of herself as a text, managing the ways her names were used” (xvii). Harris concludes that “in these protean manifestations her awareness of the importance of context is demonstrable” (xvii). “More than most writers,” she argues, “George Eliot was conscious of the intellectual and material milieux in which she operated” (xviii). Therefore, the essays in Harris’s edited collection “discuss both concepts and context contemporary with her [Eliot], and later ones, contemporary with us, to provide as full a range of lenses as possible through which to illuminate her achievement” (xviii). In keeping with the idea of providing cultural contexts for Eliot’s life and works, Harris first provides an interesting and useful twelve-page chronology that includes, along with the major events in Eliot’s life, a listing of significant contemporary historical and literary events. This makes the chronology read like an essay written within the context of cultural criticism. Part 1 of the text “offers perspectives on George Eliot’s life, particularly her career as an author, and her afterlife” (xviii). It begins with a very traditional biographical summary by Kathryn Hughes, which includes only one striking point—that George Eliot’s “The Lifted Veil” “seethes with a sense of suffocating paranoia” (8). This chapter is followed by two contributions by Joanne Shattock: a discussion of Eliot’s “Publishers and Publication” [End Page 143] and a review of the “Editions of George Eliot’s Work.” The fourth chapter, “Genre” by Nancy Henry, notes that Eliot produced work in every major literary genre except drama and provides a mainstream work-by-work summary of Eliot’s writing career. In chapter 5, titled “The Biographical Tradition,” Harris makes the assertion that “[Eliot] herself was her greatest work” (41). Harris begins with biographical facts from Eliot’s obituaries and proceeds through the major studies, including Haight’s “magisterial work” (48); Rosemary Ashton’s “pre-eminent” work, which includes “active new research” (48); and Rosemarie Bodenheimer’s “illuminating reading of the letters,” which “discloses new dimensions to an understanding of George Eliot’s actions” (49). The chapter appropriately closes with a tribute to Barbara Hardy and her “attention to imagery and language in George Eliot’s writing in all genres” (49). Chapter 6, “Afterlife,” was also written by Harris. She emphasizes that “George Eliot lives principally on in university curricula and in academic publications” (52) but notes that her legacy “is a potent one, constantly visited, revisited and revisioned” (60). This first section provides a firm foundation for the rest of the volume and a succinct summary of scholarship on George Eliot’s life up to the present. Part 2, titled “Critical Fortunes,” contains three essays by Juliette Atkinson from the University of London, who has earned a New Scholars Award from the Bibliographical Society of America. She competently sums up the critical responses to Eliot before 1900, as well as from 1900 to 1970 and from 1970 to the present. Like Harris, Atkinson gives a well-deserved tribute to the work of Barbara Hardy. Part 3, “Cultural and Social Contexts,” is made up of twenty-seven brief essays written by a variety of junior and senior scholars from the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, and Australia. Each gives a competent overview of his or her topic as it relates to Eliot’s life and novels, and each is followed by a list of sources. The most useful aspect of this collection is that readers can be sure to find essays that deal with cultural topics that have unique personal interest and appeal. I was particularly impressed with the chapters on religion, dress, education, and the Woman Question. Other topics include class, etiquette, historiography, interiors, law, music, secularism, theatre, transport, visual...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian periodicals reviewSame topicModernist Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207