MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1458653201 · doi:10.1520/stp11549s

The Origin and Behavior of a Flood Capping Layer Deposited on Contaminated Sediments of the Saguenay Fjord (Quebec)

2003· book-chapter· en· W1458653201 on OpenAlexaffabout
Émilien Pelletier, Gaston Desrosiers, Jacques Locat, Alfonso Mucci, Hugo Tremblay

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil erosion and sediment transport
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité LavalUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFjordFlood mythOceanographyGeologyLayer (electronics)ContaminationGeochemistryArchaeologyGeographyEcologyChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The upper section of the Saguenay Fjord was impacted by a catastrophic flood in July 1996. Contaminated sediments were capped by a layer of clean silty post-glacial sediments with background levels of trace metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The capping layer was characterized by geotechnical and geochemical methods and its biological recolonization was monitored by annual sampling of the macrofauna. The strong dominance of surface deposit feeders Cirratulidae and Ampharetidae was observed at most stations in the first 2–3 years followed by carnivorous annelids such as Lumbrineridae and Nephtidae species indicating a well recolonized benthic habitat in the Baie des Ha!Ha!. The presence of benthic fauna was a major factor in modifying the density of sediments by physical mixing and irrigation, and in changing the surface roughness. The slope stability of the capping layer is considered as very good except in limited deltaic sectors at the head of the Baie des Ha!Ha! The new layer showed a good efficiency to isolate contaminated sediments from the sediment/water interface. Although manganese and iron were remobilized as the new layer became anoxic, mercury, arsenic and PAHs showed a very limited mobility through the flood layer which allowed geochemists to calculate the present fluxes of toxicants to the Baie des Ha!Ha! without interferences from older contaminated sediments trapped below the flood layer. The present flux of PAHs to bay (0.9 ng.cm-2.g-1) is about 300 times lower than the 1974 flux and 8 times lower than the 1986 flux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil erosion and sediment transportFrench-language works237,207