MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 2301: Frail Elderly Patients at Increased Risk for Mortality and Prolonged Institutional Care After Cardiac Surgery

2008· article· en· W146042042 on OpenAlexaff
Dana H. Lee, Billie Jean Martin, A.M. Yip, Karen J. Buth, Gregory M. Hirsch

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineToiletingDeliriumBathingHeart failureCOPDActivities of daily livingGeriatricsInternal medicineSurgeryEmergency medicineIntensive care medicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients referred for cardiac surgery are increasingly older, but chronological age does not always capture biological age. This study assessed frailty, as a functional parameter of biological age, as a predictor of mortality or prolonged institutional care. Functional measures of frailty and clinical preoperative data were collected for all cardiac surgery patients at a single center (2004 –2007). Based on the Katz Index of Activities of Daily Living, frailty was defined as any impairment in feeding, bathing, dressing, transferring, toileting, continence, or ambulation, or dementia. The impact of frailty on in-hospital mortality or institutional discharge (other hospital or nursing facility) was assessed with multivariate logistic regression. The interaction of frailty and age was examined, with non-frail patients age<70 as the referent group. Results: Of 3096 patients, 133 (4.3%) were frail. Frail patients were older, more likely to be female, have COPD, CHF, EF<40%, recent MI, pre-operative renal failure, cerebrovascular disease, greater acuity, and more complex operations (p<0.05). Frail patients experienced higher rates of mortality, sepsis, delirium, post-operative renal failure, and transfusion (p<0.001). A greater proportion of frail patients than non-frail patients (49% vs. 9%) were discharged to a setting other than home. In the risk-adjusted models, frailty was an independent predictor of mortality (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0 –3.2) or institutional discharge (OR 6.4, 95% CI 4.1–9.9). Furthermore, frail elderly (age≥70) patients had greater risk of institutional discharge (OR 22.7, CI 12.4 – 41.7) than frail younger patients (OR 6.5, CI 3.4 –12.5) or non-frail elderly patients (OR 3.5, CI 2.6 – 4.6). Similarly, frail elderly patients had greater risk of mortality (OR 4.0, CI 1.9 – 8.1) than frail younger patients (OR 1.9, CI 0.8 – 4.7) or non-frail elderly patients (OR 2.4, CI 1.7–3.5). Frailty was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality and prolonged institutional care. Frailty combined with older age further discriminated those at highest risk. Special consideration should be given to the management of frail elderly patients who have surgical cardiac disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicFrailty in Older Adults→French-language works237,207→