MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W146078340

Juan Carlos Tabio, Cuban Cinema and the Waiting List

2001· article· en· W146078340 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Scott Forsyth

Bibliographic record

VenueCineaction! · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCuban History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComicsDreamBureaucracyConversationNarrativeComedyMovie theaterWhite (mutation)Sign (mathematics)ArtSociologyMedia studiesAestheticsArt historyHistoryVisual artsLiteratureLawPsychologyPoliticsPolitical scienceCommunication
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

director, Juan Carlos Tabio, is justly celebrated for his comic satires, like Plaff, of daily life and its human and bureaucratic follies, as well as for several memorable collaborations, including Strawberry and Chocolate, with the great Tomas Gutierrez Alea. His films often feature sophisticated play with narrative conventions and expectations and always, despite their comic, even slapstick, style, offer thoughtful consideration of serious themes. I spoke with Tabio after his latest film, Waiting List (Lista de espera) premiered in North America at the Festival in Toronto in September, 2000. interview was helpfully arranged by Augusta Dwyer, of the Festival's Press Office, who also ably translated our conversation. Waiting List is an often hilarious tale of group of passengers waiting for bus that never comes. characters offer cross-section of types facing the frustrations of everyday life -- shortages, bureaucratic confusion and indifference, the constant need to cope and improvise. After interminable delays, the passengers decide to take on the situation themselves. They try to fix broken bus and begin to transform the station itself. Romances bloom, secret desires and ambitions are revealed, the selfish interests of the few give way to the collective spirit of the many. decrepit bus station becomes idyllic, too beautiful for the characters to leave. film subtly takes us into dream, collective dream, of transformation and imagination. When reality, of course, asserts itself with shock, the characters and that reality are not quite the same as they were. film frankly confronts what it is to be and daily try to answer the question, as one character puts it, Is this socia list country or capitalist country that we here? But it also aspires to universal address, in the spirit of Bunuel, whose narrative conundrums are amusingly evoked by several characters, where we are teased and provoked by the fragile but powerful relationships between humanity's real and imaginary constructions. Tabio is an eloquent and confident man. He is pleased that this film has already opened with great success in Spain, is scheduled for release throughout Latin America and has played to appreciative audiences in Cuba, despite limited number of prints in distribution there. We began by discussing the state of cinema, since the Special Period of crisis following the collapse of the Soviet Union. Cuban cinema was in total crisis, for three years, not single film was made. But he noted that all Latin American filmmakers also faced great difficulties. There has been improvement in this situation; there are three films in post-production and one filming in Havana right now. He predicted that in few years, Cuba may be making 10 or 12 films year, more than before the crisis. Part of the solution has been the development of co-productions which provide needed financing and, crucially, allow distribution around the world. This new film is co-production between ICAIC, the Film Institute, nd Spanish, Mexican and German producers. Although co-productions are often seen as dominating process of cultural globalization, Tabio insisted that 1 am making the films I want, that this is an authentic cultural product. He says that his producers have lot of respect for creation, nothing is ever imposed and the film is the results of dialogue. He does concede that not all producers are the same and there is still a crisis for cinema all over the world brought on by video, television and powerful economic forces. Waiting List is dedicated to Titon, nickname for Alea, the most famed of filmmakers, and Tabio spoke eloquently of his very good friend and collaborator: The legacy of Alea is way of looking at reality as form of collective consciousness; the idea of the artist to give back an image of reality that is the most complex and provocative possible. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCineaction!Same topicCuban History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207