MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W146199358

Longueuil et la Rive-Sud avant le pont Jacques-Cartier

2003· article· fr· W146199358 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michel Pratt

Bibliographic record

VenueÉrudit (Université de Montréal) · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyArtHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Michel Pratt est l'un des grands connaisseurs de l'histoire de la Rive-sud de Montréal et de la Montérégie.Infatigable animateur de la Société historique du Marigot, il a présenté, à Tocccasion de la création de la «nouvelle ville» de Longueuil, un Atlas historique dont l'objectif est «de reconstituer l'évolution du territoire et de dégager les principaux traits de l'évolution sociale, économique et culturelle de la nouvelle grande ville, sur une période qui s'étend du régime français à aujourd'hui».C'est pour signaler la parution de ce document et surtout pour en souligner l'excellence et l'utilité que nous en avons tiré quelques «belles pages».Dans sa présentation, Michel Pratt espère «que cette première publication sur la nouvelle grande ville de la Rive-Sud soit un tremplin pour développer un sentiment d'appartenance régionale et une nouvelle identité municipale».Pourquoi ne pas souhaiter que ce souhait soit entendu à la grandeur du Québec maintenant que l'exemple est donné et que le modèle existe.Les pages que nous avons retenues sont tirées de deux chapitres consacrés aux moyens de transport.Nous avons opté pour les pages qui nous font passer des bateaux à vapeur au pont Jacques-Cartier.On y sent bien que l'auteur a sa ville solidement chevillée au coeur!R. & O. Steamer " Montreal," on St. Lawrence Rivei aHMBHHHBLW

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0160.008
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueÉrudit (Université de Montréal)→Same topicHistorical and Literary Studies→French-language works237,207→