MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W146312411

L'EXPERTISE D'UN ENSEIGNANT ASSOCIÉ

2000· article· fr· W146312411 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill · 2000
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Tools and Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPracticumHumanitiesSociologyPedagogyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUME. L'enseignant d'ecole elementaire ou secondaire qui recoit un futur enseignant lors de son stage de formation joue un role crucial: le role d'enseignant associe. Qu'est ce qui caracterise un enseignant associe expert? C'est la question qui a ete posee a plus de 60 enseignants de niveau elementaire et secondaire. La technique de groupe nominal utilisee pour recueillir leurs reponses a permis de faire ressortir 4 domaines de l'expertise d'un enseignant associe et l'importance relative de chacun de ces domaines. ABSTRACT. Elementary and secondary school teachers play a crucial role in the practicum of a preservice teacher: the role of associate teacher. What are the characteristics of an expert associate teacher? This was the question asked to more than 60 school teachers. Using the nominal group technique to collect their answers, four domains of this expertise were identified as well as the relative importance of each of these domains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.323
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it