MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1463872385 · doi:10.3233/oer-2008-8105

Overhead work: Identification of evidence-based exposure guidelines

2008· article· en· W1463872385 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOccupational Ergonomics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverhead (engineering)Identification (biology)Context (archaeology)Work (physics)Computer scienceApplied psychologyRisk analysis (engineering)MedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationEngineeringPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Overhead work is one determinant of the genesis and propagation of shoulder occupational musculoskeletal disorders and muscle fatigue. This is a result of a combination of organizational, biomechanical and physiological factors. In this paper, evidence for identification of the mechanisms of fatigue and injury associated with overhead work is presented in the context of ergonomic design guidance. Secondarily, although significant research efforts have analyzed and interpreted overhead work, there are limited resources available to ergonomists in which theoretical and practical concerns are combined in a single source. This review paper aims to address this deficiency by reporting on the mechanisms of exposure in overhead work and their associated negative health and performance outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it