Focus on juvenile idiopathic arthritis according to the 2001 Edmonton revised classification from the International League of Associations for Rheumatology: an Italian experience.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To classify a cohort of Italian patients categorized as affected with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) according to the revised 2001 Edmonton International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) criteria. METHODS: Eighty-five patients with JIA firstly framed depending on traditional criteria during the last ten years were reallocated according to the JIA revised criteria proposed in 2001 by ILAR in Edmonton. RESULTS: The revision consented to define the following distribution of patients: 28.2% systemic, 55.3% oligoarticular and 11.8% polyarticular forms; only one child was defined as having psoriatic arthritis, one child with enthesitis-associated arthritis and two with the undifferentiated form of JIA. DISCUSSION: The 97.6% of the recruited patients were strictly classified according to the Edmonton ILAR criteria, demonstrating a very low number of patients whose arthritis could not be assigned to any JIA category due to unfulfillment of the required criteria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".