STRAHOPOŠTOVANJE PRED ŽIVOTOM KOD ALBERTA SCHWEITZERA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Starting from the notion of veneration of life the author's intends to present Albert Schweitzer's thoughts about ethics and its relation to religion and culture. The theological background of an ethics of veneration of life is Christ's command of love extended to the universal (including all creatures). The central philosophical notion needed for a correct understanding of the basic idea of a veneration of life is the will. Ethics so far has been concerned only with the man-to-man relationship, but it should also include man's attitude towards animals, i.e. towards every form of life. However, the principle of veneration of life should not be misunderstood as if man were equal with all other living creatures in a vitalist sense. The nature does not know a veneration of life. The ethics of veneration of life attempts at establishing a unity between the mystic depth and ethical acting, i.e. the practical responsibility in the world. The veneration of life is a Christian category, but also a category concerned with humanity
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it