[Clinical presentation and risk factors for surgery in Crohn's disease].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk factors on initial surgery in Crohn's disease. METHODS: The clinical data of 173 patients with Crohn's disease who were treated during 2010 and 2014 years in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, were analyzed retrospectively. The patients who had received intestinal resection or whose initial symptoms occurred at least 5 years at the end of the follow-up were recruited. Montreal classification was used to evaluate lesion location and disease behavior. The risk factors of the initial surgery were analyzed by using Logistic regression model. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients (49.1%) received intestinal resection in 5 years after the onset of symptoms. The result of univariate analysis showed that the probability of surgical treatment is high in patients who were male and those older than 40 years at diagnosis (P<0.05). Lesions involving upper digestive tract, stenosis and penetrating lesions were also the risk factors on initial surgery in Crohn's disease (P<0.05). The result of multivariate analysis showed the relative risk of initial surgery was increased in male gender (OR=2.02, 95%CI:1.04-3.92) and in those who were older than 40 years at diagnosis (OR=2.34,95%CI:1.05-5.22). However, in patients with Crohn's disease involving colon alone, the relative risk of initial surgery was decreased (OR=0.35, 95%CI:0.13-0.97). CONCLUSION: Abdominal pain is the most common clinical presentation in Crohn's disease. Disease behavior and operation is closely related. Older than 40 years at diagnosis and male gender is high risk factor for surgery while colonic lesion alone is protective factor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".