Compositae-Associated Allergic Contact Dermatitis from Bisabolol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Compositae-related chemicals cause allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in children with atopic dermatitis (AD). Moisturizers can be an overlooked exposure source. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ACD in children with recalcitrant AD and a reported history of intolerance to Aquaphor Healing Ointment (AHO) moisturizer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed charts of children patch-tested to the ingredients of AHO moisturizer who had a history of intolerance, as well as of additional patch-tested patients with exposure to bisabolol in their personal hygiene products and without a history of product intolerance. RESULTS: Seven patients, six of whom had AD, had been referred to our clinic with a history of intolerance to the moisturizer. They were patch-tested with their moisturizer and the components provided by Beiersdorf. Of these, four had positive reactions to their AHO moisturizer and to bisabolol, a Compositae derivative. CONCLUSION: Bisabolol, a sesquiterpene alcohol, should be considered a potential cause of ACD in children with AD and a history of moisturizer intolerance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".