MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W14726647 · doi:10.4161/cc.3.3.719

The use of Palliatiave Radiotherapy for bone and brain metastases in Ontario

2009· article· en· W14726647 on OpenAlex
Daniel Samuel Sutton

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMasters Thesis · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicManagement of metastatic bone disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Cancer InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsRadiation therapyMedicineBusinessInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has long been known that human cells are more refractory than rodent cells against oncogenic transformation in vitro. Recent success to make normal human cells susceptible to oncogene-mediated transformation by the ectopic expression of the telomerase catalytic subunit (hTERT) introduces the possibility that the difference in the regulation of telomerase expression can explain the different susceptibility to transformation between human and rodent cells. In a recent study, however, we demonstrated that normal human fibroblasts are still more resistant than normal rodent fibroblasts to oncogenic transformation even with the ectopic expression of hTERT. Our results clearly indicate that a difference in telomere biology can not fully account for the species difference in transformability, and that normal human cells have still undefined intrinsic mechanisms rendering them resistant to oncogenic transformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it