MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The effect of a cancer diagnosis on disability status

2009· article· en· W147364354 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth B. Habermann, Beth A Virnig, Patricia M. McGovern, A. Marshall McBean, Bruce H. Alexander, Nancy N. Baxter

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMarital statusBreast cancerCancerEpidemiologyLogistic regressionColorectal cancerCohortProstate cancerStage (stratigraphy)Retrospective cohort studyPediatricsInternal medicinePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

6531 Background: Although cancer and cancer treatments may lead to an inability to work, working-age adults eligible for Medicare benefits on the basis of disability face a 29-month waiting period between initial application due to disability and enrollment in the program. In this study we evaluated patterns of Medicare enrollment for working-age adults with cancer and determined factors predicting enrollment. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and SEER-Medicare data were used for this retrospective cohort analysis. We included patients age 21 to 59 diagnosed with lung, prostate, colorectal, and breast cancer (female) cases from 1992 through 2002. Patients were followed until 2005 or death. We constructed line plots of time from cancer diagnosis to enrollment in Medicare due to disability, anticipating a spike in enrollment around 29 months post-diagnosis. We compared demographic and tumor characteristics in the disabled to the all similarly aged patients included in SEER. We used logistic regression to determine factors associated with enrollment in Medicare due to disability 29 to 35 months post-diagnosis including demographic characteristics, stage at diagnosis, and type of surgical treatment. Results: We identified 359,049 working-age adults who were diagnosed with prostate, lung, colorectal, or female breast cancer. Within 5 years of diagnosis, 4.4% had enrolled in Medicare due to disability, most between 29 and 31 months post-diagnosis (the earliest time period of eligibility on the basis of cancer diagnosis). Later stage at diagnosis, lack of surgical treatment, aggressive surgical treatment, unmarried marital status, Hispanic or African American race/ethnicity, older age, and male gender were associated with statistically significantly higher odds of enrollment in Medicare due to disability. Conclusions: A significant number of working-age cancer patients become eligible for enrollment in Medicare due to disability. Most become eligible between 29 and 31 months after diagnosis indicating that cancer and/or treatment had a substantial permanent impact on ability to work from the time of diagnosis. Federal policy offering Medicare benefits only 29 months after application should be reevaluated. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.514
Teacher spread0.432 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicMultiple and Secondary Primary CancersFrench-language works237,207