MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Methyl gallate protects against oxidative stress‐induced apoptosis in PC12 cells

2010· article· en· W147404924 on OpenAlexafffundabout
James A. G. Crispo, Matthew Piché, Dominique R. Ansell, Joseph K. Eibl, Isabella T. Tai, Gregory M. Ross, T.C. Tai

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicTannin, Tannase and Anticancer Activities
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyNOSM University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsApoptosisOxidative stressViability assayMitochondrionIntracellularEpigallocatechin gallateChemistryGallic acidCell biologyDNA damagePolyphenolGlutathioneGallateBiochemistryPharmacologyBiologyAntioxidantDNAEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent studies demonstrate that polyphenols reduce oxidative damage by increasing cell viability, decreasing intracellular ROS and altering GSH metabolism. In addition, polyphenols such as epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) have been reported to inhibit apoptotic signaling and increase neural cell survival. In an effort to better understand the benefits associated with polyphenol consumption, the aim of this study was to investigate potential anti‐apoptotic effects of EGCG, methyl gallate (MG), gallic acid (GA) and N‐acetylcysteine (NAC) on H2O2‐induced apoptosis in PC12 cells and elucidate protective mechanisms. Pre‐treatment with MG and NAC significantly increase viability of H2O2‐stressed cells, while pre‐treatments with EGCG and GA exacerbates stress. Analyses of apoptosis and mitochondrial membrane potential reveals that MG pre‐treatment prevents mitochondria depolarization, however does not inhibit apoptosis. Further, analysis of DNA degradation and caspase cleavage shows that MG inhibits activation of caspase 9 and has a partial inhibitory effect on DNA degradation. These findings suggest that MG may have potential therapeutic properties against mitochondria‐mediated apoptosis. Research funded by the Northern Ontario School of Medicine and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicTannin, Tannase and Anticancer ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207