MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W147516491 · doi:10.3138/cjh.36.1.51

Church, State, and Education in France From the Falloux to the Ferry Laws: A Reassessment

2001· article· en· W147516491 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of History · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Political Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyState (computer science)Competition (biology)LawSecularizationPoliticsInterpretation (philosophy)HistoriographySociologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contrary to the traditional interpretation of republican historiography, the Falloux Law opened a unique period of cooperation between Church and State in achieving universal primary schooling in France and expanding secondary schooling. Despite ideological disputes among extremists the curriculum in Catholic and state schools was similar. Catholic schools were particularly important in areas the State had neglected, especially girls’ schooling. By the Third Republic when universal primary schooling had been achieved and, at the secondary level Jesuit schools attracted French elites, competition rather than cooperation became the rule. That competition combined with political disputes led to the Ferry and later laws which secularized a pre-existing system of national schooling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it