Risk management of forest conflagration on Russian Federation territory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: \n At present in Russian Federation the Federal Special Program “Risk Reduction” is carried out. They entrust RAS institutes a part of investigations in frame of this program. At Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics RAS they carries out a part of the work concerned with creating the experiment stand of National scientific system to monitor perilous events, phenomena and processes in nature, man-caused and social spheres. In particular a system analysis of different types’ catastrophes and disasters is carried out. The present work is devoted to the actual for Russia problem of forest conflagrations.\nAt last years in Russia forest conflagrations made up a great part of emergency situations caused by perilous processes in nature. In the work we studied a natural conflagration statistics for 2005-2007 and carried out an analysis of natural conflagration extinguishing system in Russia.\nIn present work we focus a main attention to statistical data on forest conflagrations at federal and regional levels, to organization of national system of conflagration extinguishing in Canada, and to dynamics of separate conflagrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".