Архитектурный хронотоп в определении границ настоящего

Understanding of the present as space-time matter poses the question of determining its temporal and topological parameters. the philosophy of culture are increasingly talking about the phenomenon of ‘reduction of the present’ (‘time-compression’). This phenomenon is that in today's dynamic civilization amount of innovation is increasing dramatically. As a result there is a decrease in the chronological distance before last, which in many ways is already out of date, in which we can no longer recognize the familiar structure of today's life-world and which therefore seems to us strange and even incomprehensible. architecture, phenomenon of ‘reduction of the present’ manifests itself as the acceleration of both new universal architectural styles, and building dilapidation and ruination. Both this aspects are subjects of my article, and both this processes I study by using of structural analysis in framework of culturological approach. Methodological basis of such approach is systemic understanding of the social space. I am considering architecture as a spatial-temporal model of development in which the unity of the space-time forms the chronotopos. Under this approach, I distinguish periods of analysis and synthesis in the development of architectural styles as a means of establishing a relation between the present and the past, which is expanding. my article, I prove principal possibility of determining the boundaries and dimensions of the present, based on the notions of architectural chronotopos, and I suggest chronotopical (temporal-spatial) quantitative method for space-time changes in architectural landscape. Using this method, I have shown there is complex diachronism in architectural styles expressing in slow increase of the complexity of space-planning and decorative techniques, alternating with jumplike transition to the relative simplicity, clarity, obviously. I'm considering the time frame of these transitions. Thus, non-linearity of the process of development of architecture manifests itself (i) in asymmetry in the period of ‘analyzing’ and ‘synthesizing’ styles: the duration of the first monotonically decreases from 10.2 to 1.7 centuries, the duration of the second is relatively constant (2.2–1.8 century); (ii) in a steady trend to reduce the time of domination of all architectural styles, without exception, Using chronotopical method, I also show ‘the present’ in the form of a modern civil architecture lasts only twenty or thirty years. duration of the present by its quantitative characteristics is close to duration of one generation, during which ‘worn out’ architectural and landscape components of the space of social being. This phenomenon manifests itself differently in different types of societies: it is very pronounced in modern Western world, and is practically absent in the societies of the traditional type. My conclusion is: using architectural chronotope it is possible to determine boundaries of the present to reflect on the consequences of its decline: (i) narrowing the range of knowledge, previously considered essential for cultural rights; (ii) the expansion of orientations (choice of other modes of existence); (iii) reduction of rationality and predictability of decisions undertaken; (iv) the dominance of the principle of sociocultural relevance and pragmatism.. space of being; architectural environment; development of architectural styles; architectural chronotopos; chronotopical method; reduction of the present; ruination Agafonov S.L. Regularities in the Development of Styles. Architecture of the Volume 2: Proceedings of the Conference East – West: Interaction of Traditions in Architecture. Moscow: Architectura Publisher, 1993, pp. 192–197. (In Russian). Aitmatov Ch.T. Day Lasts More Than Hundred Years. Moscow: Azbuka-Klassika Publisher 2003. Digital Library ModernLib.Ru. N.p., n.d. Web . (In Russian). Aristotle. Physics. Writings. Moscow: Mysl Publisher, 1981, volume 3, pp. 145–158. Allor M. Locating Cultural Activity: 'Main' as Chronotope and Heterotopia. TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies 1.1 (1997): 42–54. Aurelius Augustine. Confessions. Augustine Aurelius, Confession. Abelard P., History of My Misfortunes. Moscow: Respublika Publisher, 1992, pp. 8–222. (In Russian). Berg M. Unofficial Leningrad Literature Between Past and Future. Speech at the ICCEES World Congress in Berlin (2005). Personal Website of Writer Mikhail Berg. M. Berg, 2005. Web. . (In Russian). Fedorov V.V. The Style as Embodied Understanding of the World. Bulletin of the Tver State University. Series Philosophy 2.27 (2011): 4–9. (In Russian). Fedorov V.V., Davydov V.A., Levikov A.V. Architectural Ruins in the Modern World. Architecture and Building in Russia 11 (2013): 14–21. (In Russian). Fedorov V.V., Ovtcharova A.Zh. Phenomenon of City: Value-Semantic Aspect. Saarbrucken: Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2012. (In Russian). Giedion S. Space, and Architecture: Growth of a New Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982. Humphries J. The Vanishing Present. Irish Arts Review 28.3 (2011): 62–63. Iovlev V.I. Architectural Chronotope and Iconic. Semiotics Space. Proceedings of the International Association for Semiotics of Space. Yekaterinburg: Arkhitektor Publiher, 1999, pp. 103–115. (In Russian). Jones P. Putting Architecture in Its Social Place: A Cultural Political Economy of Architecture. Urban Studies 46.12 (2009): 2519–2536. Koselleck R. „Erfahningsraum“ und „Erwartungshorizont“ zwei historische Kategorien. Logik – Ethik – Theorie der Geisteswissenschaften, XI. Deutscher Kongres fur Philosophie, Gottingen 6.–9. Oktober 1975. Hrsg. von G. Patzig, E. Scheibe und W. Wieland, Hamburg: Meiner, 1977, S. 191–208. Lubbe H. In the Course of the Time. Shortened Stay in the Present. Problems of Philosophy 4 (1994): 94–113. (In Russian). O'Keeffe T. Time-Space Compression, Ruination, and the 'profound Otherness' of Ground Zero. Crossing Borders: Space Beyond Disciplines. Eds. K. James-Chakraborty and S. Strumper-Krobb. New York: Peter Lang, 2011, pp. 177–188. Pallasmaa J. Hapticity and Time: Notes on Fragile Architecture. Review 207.1239 (2000):78–85. Pasternak B. Unique Days. Selected Writings. St. Petersburg: Kristall Publisher, 1998, volume 2, p. 502.  (In Russian). Pearson M.P., Richards C. Ordering the World: Perceptions of Architecture, Space, and Time. Architecture and Order: Approaches to Social Space. London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 1–37. Rubinstein S.L. Fundamentals of General Psychology. Moscow: Uchpedgiz Publisher, 1946. (In Russian). Tsukanov B.I. in the Human Psyche. Odessa: AstroPrint Publisher, 2000. (In Russian). Zemun Yu.A. Time Insight That Changes Lives. Between the Past and the Future. Yuri Zeman’s Blog. Yu. Zeman, 29 Jan. 2010. Web. . (In Russian). Fedorov, V. V. Architectural Chronotopos in Defining Boundaries of the Present. Space and 1/2 (2015): 151–155. (In Russian). Fixed network address 2226-7271provr_st1_2-19_20.2015.42.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.