MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1478349014 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.126

Reliability estimation of a production system subject to condition monitoring with two modes of failures

2015· article· en· W1478349014 on OpenAlexaff
Akram Khaleghei, Viliam Makiš

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReliability and Maintenance Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability (semiconductor)ResidualHidden Markov modelComputer scienceExpectation–maximization algorithmReliability engineeringConditional probabilityObservableProcess (computing)Markov processState (computer science)Maximum likelihoodAlgorithmEngineeringMathematicsStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a new fault prediction model for a partially observable production system subject to two failure modes, namely a catastrophic failure and a failure due to the system degradation. The degradation process is described by a three states hidden Markov model(HMM). It is assumed that the time to sudden failure is dependent on system operating state. The parameter estimation procedure based on the Expectation-Maximization(EM) algorithm is developed. Explicit formulas for the conditional reliability function and the mean residual life are derived in terms of the posterior probability that the system is in the warning state. The method is illustrated using simulated data. The effectiveness of the proposed HMM to predict failures is then compared with the performance of the previously published HM model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicReliability and Maintenance OptimizationFrench-language works237,207