MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1479677959

Now Where Are Those Keys? A Primer on Car Sharing

2008· article· en· W1479677959 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charlie Munn

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œParking professional · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCar sharingRentingSharing economyPaymentBusinessService (business)Transport engineeringPoolingTraffic congestionBike sharingAdvertisingComputer securityEngineeringMarketingFinanceComputer scienceWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Launched in Switzerland in 1987, car sharing began in North America in 1993 in Quebec City. Essentially a member-based time-share automobile rental service, car sharing is also known as public motor pooling and short term car rental. Seen as a method of mitigating traffic congestion and parking demand, car sharing allows program members to use automobiles when they desire, with payment for service based on how much they drive. Car sharing implementation by colleges and universities is examined. Zipcar is North America's leading shared car provider. Websites pertinent to car sharing include www.carsharing.net and www.Zipcar.com.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œParking professionalSame topicTransportation and Mobility InnovationsFrench-language works237,207