MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1479686495 · doi:10.1109/crv.2015.33

Latent SVM for Object Localization in Weakly Labeled Videos

2015· article· en· W1479686495 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMultimodal Machine Learning Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of ManitobaNvidia
KeywordsComputer scienceObject (grammar)Artificial intelligenceSupport vector machineThe InternetComputer visionClass (philosophy)Pattern recognition (psychology)Information retrievalWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the problem of object localization in Internet videos. An Internet video (e.g. YouTube videos) is often associated with a semantic label (also known as a tag) describing the main object present within it. However, the tag does not provide any spatial or temporal information about the main object in the video. Such videos are weakly labelled. Given weakly labelled video with video-level object class tags, our goal is to learn a model that can be used to localize the objects in other videos with such tags. We define a latent SVM based learning framework to tackle this problem. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on a dataset composed of videos collected from YouTube.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207