MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1479711442 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab61

61 ISOLATION AND CULTURE OF SOMATIC CELLS OBTAINED FROM SEMEN AND MILK OF GULF COAST NATIVE SHEEP

2004· article· en· W1479711442 on OpenAlexafffund
Liesl Nel‐Themaat, R.A. Godke, B. L. Dresser, P. Damiani

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersInternational Council for Canadian StudiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsSemenExtenderSpermAnimal scienceBiologyAndrologyChemistryBotanyAnatomyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In addition to the sperm found in semen, somatic cells (SC) are frequently present. Furthermore, SC are also present in fresh milk. These SC could also be a potential source of biomaterial for the preservation of endangered species. In the present study, the possibility of isolating SC from fresh, cooled and frozen semen, as well as from fresh milk, was evaluated in the endangered Gulf Coast Native sheep. Semen from 7 mature rams was collected by electro-ejaculation and a 0.5-mL sample from each ejaculate was then diluted in PBS (22°C). The remainder of the ejaculate was cooled (4°C), extended in a TRIS-yolk-glycerol extender, loaded into 0.5-mL plastic straws and frozen. Semen from the same collection (2–5 straws) was also diluted in PBS and allotted to the cooled semen treatment group (4°C). Sheep milk samples (n = 26) from 5 Gulf Coast Native (GCN) ewes and 11 crossbred ewes (GCN × Suffolk) were collected and stored at 4°C. Samples of fresh (0.5 mL), cooled (2–5 straws) and frozen–thawed (2–5 straws) semen and refrigerated milk (15–50 mL) were washed with PBS, centrifuged at 500g for 10 min and the re-suspended pellet cultured in tissue culture dishes containing 2 mL of DMEM with 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS) plus 100 µM nonessential amino acids, supplemented with antibiotics and incubated at 38.5°C in 5% CO2 in air. After 24 h, the semen sample culture dishes were rinsed twice with fresh culture medium to remove remaining sperm cells and then returned to the the incubator. After 3 to 7 d of incubation, groups of epithelial-like cell colonies were detected in 1 sample from the fresh semen group (1 of 7 rams, 14.3%) and 4 semen samples from the cooled group (4 of the 7 of rams, 57%). These cells subsequently proliferated until a monolayer was observed; the cells were then harvested and plated (in a single culture dish) for further passage. One cell line survived from the cooled semen group, which was frozen in DMEM medium with 15% FBS and 10% DMSO and then stored in LN2. No cells were derived from the frozen-thawed semen group. Colonies of fibroblast-like or epithelial-like cells were detected after culture of the milk samples. Of the 26 colonies, 23 (88%) initially plated cells, 11 (41%) proliferated to the 1st passage, 5 (19%) resulted in cell lines that were frozen and 2 (8%) of these subsequently proliferated during post-thaw incubation. The genetic status of the cell lines that proliferated until cryopreservation was assessed by PCR amplification of microsatellite markers. Results confirmed that the cell populations derived from both the semen and milk samples originated from the appropriate donor animals. Also, immuno-histochemical analyses for vimentin and cytokeratin were performed on these cell populations to determine the morphological cell type. Cells derived from semen samples were identified as epithelial cells by the presence of cytokeratin, whereas the milk samples produced epithelial and fibroblast cells. In the present study, we demonstrated that it is possible to establish a somatic cell line from cooled semen, as well as from fresh milk, in an endangered sheep. This approach could provide cell lines from valuable animals when other means of obtaining cells are not possible. This project was partially funded by the J. Bennett Johnston Science Foundation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207