MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1479740851

Construction of Inuinnaqtun (Real Inuit-way) : Self-Image and Everyday Practices in Inuit Society

2002· article· en· W1479740851 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Keiichi Omura

Bibliographic record

VenueSenri ethnological studies · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEveryday lifeSymbol (formal)Ethnic groupIdentity (music)Gender studiesSociologyPoliticsKey (lock)AnthropologyEthnologyAestheticsPolitical scienceArtLinguisticsEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Netsilik Inuit people living in Pelly Bays, Nunavut, Canada, in spite of having experienced great socio-cultural change since the 1950s, preserve their ethnic identity through priding themselves on being Inuit. One key factor of their identity is an idealised self-imagery, which is condensed in the concept inuinnaqtun (real Inuit way; inummarittitut in other dialects). Inuinnaqtun is the Inuit ways of perceiving, thinking, acting, speaking, etc., that is, the true Inuit way of life. Inuinnaqtun plays an important role as an ethnic symbol in contemporary Canadian socio-political discourse. By considering the cognitive basis of their self-imagery expressed in everyday practices, the A. analyses the following points: (1) what inuinnaqtun is in present Netsilik society, and (2) how inuinnaqtun is constructed and reproduced in everyday Netsilik practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSenri ethnological studiesSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207