How long can we expect pertussis protection to last after the adolescent booster dose of tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis (Tdap) vaccines?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Possibly 10 years. The longest published follow-up extended five years, at which time antibody levels and cell-mediated immunity were still readily detectable (1). The slow antibody decay pattern suggests that protection will last for at least 10 years (2). However, antibody levels do not correlate well with protection against pertussis, so proof of ongoing protection will have to come from epi-demiological studies. A major challenge for pertussis control is that neither natural infection nor immunization induce life-long immunity against subsequent infection. After the introduction of pertussis vaccine more than five decades ago, disease incidence decreased dramatically from 157 per 100,000 individuals in the prevaccine era to less than one per 100,000 individuals in the early 1970s, a decrease of more than 99%. The majority of remaining cases were noted in children younger than 10 years of age. Over the past two decades, a gradual increase in pertussis incidence has occurred (Figure 1), reaching 8.9 per 100,000 individuals per year in 2004, with the majority of cases now seen in adolescents and adults (1,2), who are the major source of infection for young infants (3). Fully immunized children older than six months of age are well protected by acellular vaccines. Young infants often have severe pertussis, and account for most related deaths (4). To improve disease control, all provinces and territories have expanded their pertussis immunization programs to include a booster dose for adolescents, namely the tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis (Tdap) vaccine. Two such products that contain reduced amounts of diphtheria and certain pertussis antigens to minimize side effects are currently approved for use in adolescents and adults. Adverse effects occur at approximately the same rates with Tdap, and combined tetanus-diphtheria vaccines. Figure 1 Incidence rate of pertussis infections in Canada between 1924 and 2004, based on notifications to Health Canada. Reproduced from reference 10 The mechanism of immunity to pertussis after natural infection or immunization is complex and not fully understood. Immunity has been shown to wane seven to 20 years after natural infection and five to 10 years after immunization with whole cell vaccines (5). Current acellular vaccines elicit antibodies to the key antigens of pertussis including pertussis toxin, pertactin (PRN), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) and fimbriae, but the minimum serum antibody concentrations that protect against infection have not yet been determined. Cell-mediated immunity against pertussis is also elicited by immunization, but its role in protecting against infection is unclear (6,7). Edelman et al (7) recently reported persistence of immunoglobulin G antibodies against PRN and FHA, five years after Tdap booster vaccination of adolescents. They also demonstrated persistent cell-mediated immunity responses against pertussis toxin, PRN and FHA, consistent with ongoing immune memory. Thus, the authors predicted that adequate protection would extend beyond five years and probably to 10 years postimmunization (7). That means adolescent vaccinees may again become susceptible to pertussis as young adults and/or parents, and pose a risk for young infants. Developing strategies to extend protection among adults will be essential for maximal disease control. Implementing Tdap boosters every 10 years in adults is unlikely to be sufficient given the poor compliance with 10-yearly tetanus-diphtheria boosters. Innovative approaches are needed, such as targeting adults about to start a family or possibly boosting women during pregnancy (a subject of ongoing studies) (8). Recently, a group of pertussis researchers recommended a ‘cocooning’ strategy, which entails immunization of family members and close contacts of the newborn, aiming to create a protective environment for the most vulnerable infants where it is economically feasible (9). Awareness about pertussis, its risks and the importance of vaccination needs to be emphasized to adolescents and adults, including health care workers and day care providers who care for children. Paediatricians should ensure that they and their office staff have set a good example. The Upshots column in Paediatrics & Child Health is meant to address practical questions without ready answers in standard references such as the Red Book or the Canadian Immunization Guide. Readers are invited to submit questions to the journal office. A timely response will be provided, whenever possible, from one member of a panel of experts. The most interesting exchanges will be selected for publication. Submitters should identify themselves, but will be given the option of anonymity in the published version. Submitted questions may be edited for clarity and brevity. David Scheifele MD Associate Editor, Paediatrics & Child Health
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".