MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1479834929

A framework for secure integration of distributed point-of-care testing results into Electronic Medical Records

2013· article· en· W1479834929 on OpenAlex
Waqar Haque, Alan D. Reed, A. McCann

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Information Society · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicElectronic Health Records Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoint-of-care testingComputer scienceHealth carePoint of careHealth recordsMedical recordComputer securityMedicineNursing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Point-of-care testing (POCT) data is inherently distributed in nature and, unfortunately, seldom make it to the patient's Electronic Medical Records due to privacy issues, lack of standards, lack of connectivity, and absence of industry standard protocols. A Health Level 7 (HL7) compliant, secure data communication infrastructure has been developed to replicate communication patterns commonly found in healthcare environments. This infrastructure is used to demonstrate how POCT results collected using mobile devices can be securely integrated with existing medical information systems. Such integration improves patient's care by making the results immediately available to the health care team, allowing for well-informed and effective clinical decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score0.746

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it