¿Por qué a pesar de tanta mierda este barrio es poder? Historias locales a la luz nacional
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El artículo describe la historia del barrio Antioquia (Medellín) a partir L de los recuerdos y testimonios de sus habitantes y a la luz de las transformaciones históricas de Medellín y Colombia en los últimos setenta años. Se propone una lectura relacional y localizada del transcurrir histórico para enfatizar que los procesos que tienen lugar localmente, en este caso en el ámbito barrial, hacen parte y dan cuente. de procesos regionales y globales más amplios. El diálogo histórico se construye desde una pregunta acerca de las identidades culturales en ámbitos atravesados por múltiples violencias. Se examinan los modos en que las identidades culturales se construyen y transforman a partir de la experiencia vivida del lugar barrial, desde las memorias individuales y colectivas y en relación con propuestas culturales, formas de poder y procesos macro sociales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".