MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1480207262 · doi:10.1002/9780470714461.app3

Appendix C: Transcripts of The Four Echoes

2008· other· en· W1480207262 on OpenAlexaff
Romney B. Duffey, John W. Saull

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear and radioactivity studies
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlackoutEcho (communications protocol)CrashDialog boxSpace ShuttleChronologyArchaeologyAeronauticsHistoryEngineeringPower (physics)PhysicsComputer scienceAerospace engineeringElectric power systemComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This appendix contains sections titled: Power Blackout, Columbia Space Shuttle loss, Concorde Crash and Chernobyl Accident The Combination of Events The Four Echoes Share the Same Four Phases Appendix. Blackout Chronology and the Dialog from Midday 14 August 2003 The Second Echo: Columbia/Challenger Appendix: Shuttle Dialog and Transcripts The Third Echo: Concorde Tires and SUVs Appendix: Dialog for the Concorde Crash The Fourth Echo: TMI/Chernobyl Appendix: Chronology and Transcripts of the Chernobyl Reactor Unit 4 Accident Sources Conclusion and Echoes: Predicting the Unpredictable

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNuclear and radioactivity studiesFrench-language works237,207