MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1480256054 · doi:10.1002/0471143030.cb1906s21

Experimental Metastasis Assays in the Chick Embryo

2003· article· en· W1480256054 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Protocols in Cell Biology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsOttawa Regional Cancer Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChorioallantoic membraneMetastasisEmbryoCancer metastasisBiologyCancer cellOuabainCell biologyCancerPathologyCancer researchChemistryMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experimental metastasis assays are used to measure the ability of cancer cells to grow in secondary organs following injection of the cells into the circulation of an experimental animal. The chicken embryo provides an alternative to the more commonly used assays in mice. Details of the experimental metastasis assay in chick embryo are provided, including protocols for maintenance of fertilized chicken eggs, injection of cells into the circulation of 11-day-old chick embryos, recovery and quantification of cancer cells from chick liver using the ouabain plating assay, labeling of cells with fluorescent nanospheres, and monitoring of individual steps in the metastatic process in the chick chorioallantoic membrane using intravital videomicroscopy. These assays provide a cost-effective, readily accessible, and rapid approach for studying the process of cancer metastasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it