MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1480298393 · doi:10.1002/xrs.2384

Measurement of proton beam fluence by PIXE analysis of residual gas

2012· article· en· W1480298393 on OpenAlexaff
J. Voltr, Zdeněk Nejedlý

Bibliographic record

VenueX-Ray Spectrometry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluenceBeam (structure)ArgonResidualProtonSample (material)Materials scienceIrradiationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Atomic physicsOpticsNuclear physicsChemistryPhysicsComputer scienceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knowledge of beam fluence has a crucial role in quantitative particle‐induced X‐ray emission analysis. In some situations, a direct measurement of the beam charge on the target is either impossible or impractical. In such cases, indirect determination of the beam fluence can utilise the characteristic X‐ray of argon or other gases, which was being kept at a stable low partial pressure in the vicinity of the analysed sample. As the X‐ray signal of argon depends on the total charge, it can be used to quantify the charge. This paper describes the experimental design, the hardware and software modules that we created, the validation of the method, the application of the method during elemental analyses of fragile philatelic samples with overprints, and the lessons learned. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueX-Ray SpectrometrySame topicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence AnalysisFrench-language works237,207