MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1480407107

Image classification for a time-domain microwave radar system: Experiments with stable modular breast phantoms

2015· article· en· W1480407107 on OpenAlexaff
Adam Santorelli, Olivier Laforest, Emily Porter, Milica Popović

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Conference on Antennas and Propagation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrowave imagingBreast tumorModular designMicrowaveRadarBiomedical engineeringComputer scienceTime domainBreast tissueComputer visionArtificial intelligenceMaterials scienceBreast cancerMedicineTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we report on durable, long-lasting rubber breast phantoms that contain four tissue types (skin, gland, fat, and tumor) that accurately mimic their dielectric properties. An improved fabrication procedure for creating stable high-water content tissue phantoms is demonstrated. The phantoms are made in a modular fashion such that the configuration, including tumor depth, size, and presence of tumor, can be varied as desired. Further, we reconstruct images of the phantoms using our time-domain microwave radar system. The images are then used to test an image classification algorithm that aims to identify if the image under consideration is one of a healthy breast or a breast that contains a malignancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Conference on Antennas and PropagationSame topicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering AnalysisFrench-language works237,207