MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1480660824

Efficient design optimization of microwave circuits using parallel computational methods

2012· article· en· W1480660824 on OpenAlex
Venu-Madhav-Reddy Gongal-Reddy, Shunlu Zhang, Yazi Cao, Qi‐Jun Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Microwave Integrated Circuit Conference · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpeedupComputer scienceMathematical optimizationComputationElectronic circuitSpace mappingFilter (signal processing)Point (geometry)MicrowaveOptimization problemAlgorithmParallel computingMathematicsEngineeringTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An efficient design optimization technique is proposed for microwave circuits using multi-point function evaluations in each iteration to achieve a large effective optimization update. In this technique, a local model is developed in the neighborhood of the nominal point for each iteration. EM data for building the local model is optimally chosen using design of experiments method. Further, the EM data is generated by running multiple EM simulations in parallel on a multi-processor environment. Hence, we can afford to develop a local model for a wider neighborhood by increasing the number of EM simulations and still keep the computation time low. Once developed, the local model allows a large and effective optimization update in the wider neighborhood of the nominal point, thereby resulting in fewer optimization iterations and achieving speedup for the optimization process. Two typical band-pass filter examples are used to illustrate the proposed technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it