MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1480839840 · doi:10.4000/vertigo.13751

Le rôle du Centre excursionniste de Catalogne et de la Société Peñalara dans la patrimonialisation des Pyrénées Aragonaises (fin XIXe – début XXe siècle)

2013· article· fr· W1480839840 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Juan Carlos Rubio Sevilla

Bibliographic record

VenueVertigO · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrbanism, Landscape, and Tourism Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La création des premières associations de montagne et d’excursionnistes ibériques a lieu durant le dernier quart du XIXe siècle et les premières décennies du XXe dans le contexte de prolifération des clubs alpins en Europe. Dès le début de leurs activités, elles entrent en rapport avec le collectif pyrénéiste français qui dirige la découverte scientifique, culturelle et sportive dans la haute montagne aragonaise. C’est alors que le Centre excursionniste de Catalogne et la Société Peñalara de Madrid programment des campagnes montagnardes dans les Pyrénées Centrales. Désormais, ces sociétés contribuent à la consolidation du « sentiment de montagne » au sud de la chaîne pyrénéenne. L’objectif de ce travail est de mettre en évidence le rôle de ces associations en tant qu’acteurs dans la valorisation patrimoniale de cette région après l’élan précurseur français.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVertigOSame topicUrbanism, Landscape, and Tourism StudiesFrench-language works237,207