Bibliographic record
Abstract
La gastronomie yucatèque a fait son apparition durant la seconde moitié du XXe siècle en tant qu’aboutissement de longs processus historiques se jouant aux niveaux local, global et translocal. Une forte opposition culturelle à la cuisine nationale mexicaine renforce la spécificité culturelle de cette gastronomie, et les ingrédients, les recettes et les techniques culinaires employés au Yucatán la relient à d’autres formes culinaires du monde caraïbe. Cet article soutient que l’apparition d’une gastronomie yucatèque distincte est née de l’inclination au cosmopolitisme d’une population locale désireuse de s’approprier et d’adapter les contributions culinaires des immigrants venus d’Europe, du Moyen-Orient, de l’Amérique du Nord et d’autres pays de la région caraïbe. Cette situation a stimulé les connexions latérales, mineures et translocales qui ont contribué à faire de l’alimentation yucatèque un métissage culturel qui a fait fusionner les pratiques et les ingrédients locaux, translocaux et globaux. J’avance que l’intégration du local au global reconfigure la part et l’importance de la cuisine yucatèque dans le marché régional, national et international des nourritures culturelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.376 | 0.109 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".