MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1481010663 · doi:10.1109/acc.2015.7172020

An input-output approach to robust synchronization

2015· article· en· W1481010663 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynchronization (alternating current)Nonlinear systemCoupling (piping)Computer scienceControl theory (sociology)Feature (linguistics)Synchronization networksTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsArtificial intelligencePhysicsEngineeringCombinatoricsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper adopts an input-output framework to provide sufficient conditions under which robust output synchronization is achieved in a network of uncertain compartmental models. The network model consists of compartments each of which is composed of interconnected nonlinear subunits. A distinctive feature of the approach is that it takes into account nonlinear perturbations on the diffusive coupling interaction among the compartments. The main result is sufficient conditions for robust synchronization in the form of an L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> estimate of the synchronization error over an arbitrarily long observation period. The results are illustrated with a network of Goodwin oscillators where the diffusive coupling is affected by nonlinear perturbations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern FormationFrench-language works237,207