The Gathering of the Gurus: Spiritual Capital and the Shambhala Institute for Authentic Leadership
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article suggère que la notion de Jon McKenzie selon laquelle la « performance » est une nouvelle formation de pouvoir onto-historique peut nous aider à comprendre pourquoi les activités qui font appel à la spiritualité, à la performance culturelle et aux pratiques administratives à rendement élevé sont à l’avant-garde de modes de contrôle social en émergence. L’exemple du programme d’été du Shambhala Institute for Authentic Leadership de Halifax (NouvelleÉcosse) sert à illustrer l’intégration de composantes qui font appel à la spiritualité, à la performance et au capital. L’auteur montre comment des modes de performance orientalisés qui ont été appropriés par l’Institute fonctionnent en conjonction avec des formes avancées de « gestion de la performance » pour justifier la présence d’un corps astral corporatif et la suppression concomitante des contradictions du capital au sein des corps situés sur des maillons inférieurs de la grande chaîne d’une entité sociale donnée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".