The Potential Of The APEC Grouping To Promote Intra-Regional Trade In The Asia-Pacific Region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 19.8pt 0pt 0.25in; mso-pagination: none;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-bidi-font-style: italic;">This study examines whether the proposed APEC free trade area would promote a high level of intra-APEC trade after its completion.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>To achieve this goal, a modified gravity model is estimated for the thirteen APEC countries based on annual trade data from 1989 to 1998.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>The results indicate that a high level of trade interdependence already exists to help promote the intra-APEC trade flows after its FTA completion.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>The results also suggest that the APEC countries are more likely to trade with other member countries than with non-member countries</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></span></p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".