MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Schumpeter, Marx et Walras. Entrepreneur et devenir du capitalisme

2012· article· fr· W1481568771 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sophie Boutillier, Dimitri Uzunidis

Bibliographic record

VenueInterventions économiques · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsNeoclassical economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schumpeter invente l’entrepreneur pour conceptualiser l’acte d’innovation dont le modèle de l’économie pure de Walras est incapable de rendre compte. Ce faisant, il se rapproche de Marx. Dans cet article, nous proposons de revenir sur les deux économistes nodaux, Walras et Marx, qui ont en quelque sorte balisé l’œuvre de Schumpeter. Admiratif de l’œuvre de l’un et de l’autre, celui-ci a entrepris à les dépasser. Est-il vraiment parvenu à le faire ? L’entrepreneur, d’une part, dans l’œuvre de Schumpeter reste une entité abstraite, alors qu’il avait pour ambition de pallier à l’abstraction walrasienne. De l’autre côté, il ne peut que constater la bureaucratisation, via la concentration, de la production capitaliste qui devient la norme du capitalisme managérial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterventions économiquesSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207